all bits considered data to information to knowledge

28Jul/100

Documenting Open Source Software with Doxygen

By now, open source software has found its ways into enterprise development, and it is no longer a subject for discussion - whether it could be used or not. It can. It is being used by major corporations, and entirely new business models were created around supporting open source, often also free, software.

The prime examples, such as Apache, JBoss, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Drupal, Subversion, Pentaho - to name but a few - are counting their deployments into hundreds of thousands. And then there are less known projects, hosted at sites dedicated to open source such as Apache Foundation,   SourceForge and Codeplex Foundation, which provide components that could be used in your own development (checking licensing terms is highly recommended!)

The good news is that these projects could be used to solve your particular problems; the bad news is that because of limited developers resources these projects might have inadequate documentation, in some cases - non-existent. Here's where the "open" nature of the software is at its best. You can do it yourself.

My current favourite tool to document source code is Doxygen. The tool was developed by Dmitry van Heesch, and released under GNU General public license. It compiles superb documentation  for C++, C, Java, Objective-C, Python, IDL (Corba and Microsoft flavors), Fortran, VHDL, PHP, C#, and to some extent D. Here are but two examples of of the documentation I've generated from the open source code:

iTextSharp library (a port of the hugely popular iText open source Java library for PDF generation written entirely in C# for the .NET platform) and  SharpSSH (a secure Shell library for .Net, created by Tamir Gal and released under BSD style license).

Doxygen generated documentation for iTextSharp 5.0.2

Doxygen generated documentation for SharpSSH 1.1.1.13





21Jan/100

FUD for thought

"To be uncertain is to be uncomfortable,but to be certain is to be ridiculous. " Chinese Proverb

The European Commission today (January 21, 2010) cleared Oracle's agreement to acquire Sun Microsystems. What does it mean for the development community, specifically for the future of Sun's crown jewels: MySQL, OpenOffice, GlassFish EE server, NetBeans... Oracle had almost a year to figure things out.

NetBeansis especially vulnerable given tha Oracle has competing JDeveloper (and Bea Java Dev tool); maybe it will be released as open source project to the community? Rolled into JDeveloper? Discontinued?

Why would Oracle need GlassFish when it already has Bea and Oracle AS? Cannibalization is very likely.

MySQL? Anybody's guess, but I bet that it will be supported and development will continue; maybe will undergo Oracle-ization (for example, replace MySQL procedural extensions - just introduced in version 5.0 - with robust mature PL/SQL). Will it still be free? Given $1 bln Sun had spent acquiring it, and $7+ bln Oracle spent acquiring Sun, it seems plausible to assume that Oracle would try to squeeze some dough out of it. Its own flagship database sales were stung by ascending SQL Server and IBM.. I see PostgreSQL as a winner, the only enterprise capable true open source RDBMS on the market.

Java. Once positioned as a spear at Microsoft's heart; not anymore - the landscape has changed, notably with Google becoming a major player, and Microsoft wisely playing its cards by releasing C# as open standard. Yet, I do not see Oracle donating Java to the open source community, most likely we'll see variations of Sun's controlled "Community Development Process". Oracle made significant investment into Java, supporting it inside its products, and even creating its own IDE... but what is going to happen to infant JavaFX ? RIA market is getting saturated - Flash/FlexSilverlight, AJAX (and Ajax support frameworks such as GWT)... Apache Pivot looks darn promising..  Will Oracle have enough resources to spread around?

Solaris. SUN's very own implementation of Unix operating system, arguable the best out there, AIX and HP-UX market penetration notwithstanding. For a long time Oracle and Solaris were inseparable; if an Oracle DBA did not run his database on Solaris he was somewhat deemed less competent. Then Linux came of age, and Oracle made huge bet on it (remember "Linux makes Oracle Unbreakable!",or  was it other way around?). Now they OWN the platform that they flagship database was designed for. Will they ditch Linux? Unlikely. Linux is on upswing, it is robust, reliable and has enterprise level support. Will Oracle push Solaris? Not exactly their domain of expertise, and market of operating systems is not as lucrative as it used to be. Then there is issue of the Sun's proprietary hardware - hugely overpriced, increasingly obsolete... Sun recognized that they cannot charge premium prices for the hardware that is becoming a commodity, and released x86 version of Solaris; it flopped (why x86 Solaris when I can run x86 Linux?). Apple seems to be able to create perception of superiority of both software (Mac OS) and hardware (Apple), but I credit Steve Jobs for it (to support my suspicion, follow the ups and downs of Apple stock plotted against timeline of Steve's health news; also, reliability of Apple laptops lags that of Asus , Toshiba and Sony - yet there is unshakeable perception that Mac is light years ahead of lowly PC... yalk about selling sizzle!)

My bet is that Solaris will be retired over period of time in favour of Linux.... R.I.P.

NB: FUD  - Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt